This is the eighth instalment in my 2024 resolution to read a book per month from Anthony Powell’s A Dance to the Music of Time sequence. Published between 1951 and 1975, and set from the early 1920s to the early 1970s, the sequence is narrated by Nicholas Jenkins, a man born into privilege and based on Powell himself.
The eighth volume, The Soldier’s Art, was published in 1966 and is set in 1941.Unlike the previous few novels, this only had three chapters, the middle one depicting Nick’s leave in London, bookended by his experiences in the army while still billeted in Northern Ireland.
As I mentioned in the previous volume’s post, Nick doesn’t really fit in with army life. But he doesn’t particularly labour on this, or feel sorry for himself. I enjoyed this exchange when he runs into Bithel again:
“’Told me you were a reader – like me – didn’t you?’
‘Yes I am. I read quite a lot.’
I no longer attempted to conceal the habit, with all its undesirable implications. At least admitting to it put one in a recognisably odd character of persons from whom less need be expected than the normal run.”
In this volume I felt I saw a much fuller picture of Nick’s touchstone Widmerpool. Is machinatious a word? If it isn’t, the character of Widmerpool suggests it should be, because his machinations inform his behaviour through and through.
Nick is acting as his secretary, desperate to get away.
“Indeed, it was often necessary to remind oneself that low spirits, disturbed moods, sense of persecution, were not necessarily the consequences of serving in the army, or being part of a nation at war, with which all inclusive framework depressive mental states now seemed automatically linked.”
Nick manages to stay out of Widmerpool’s connivances due to the latter’s egomaniacal need for control. However, he can observe his senior officer’s behaviour at much close quarters than before, including:
“An amateur soldier in relation to tactical possibilities, and … a professional trafficker in intrigue”
“[My] incredulity was due, I suppose, to an underestimation, even after the years I had known him, of Widmerpool’s inordinate, almost morbid self-esteem.”
By the end of the novel Widmerpool is moving on, and I had a horrible feeling that by the end of this novel sequence he might be Prime Minister…
Another of Nick’s schoolfriends is present in the company. Stringer, maintaining his sobriety, turns up as a mess waiter.
“Friendship, popularly represented as something simple and straightforward – in contrast with love – is perhaps no less complicated, requiring equally mysterious nourishment”
Stringer is an intriguing character, with a deep sense of sadness about him. We’ve never learnt what led him to self-medicate with alcohol, and now he is sober he seems to have an extreme resignation to life. He seems too equanimous, knowing no joy. I find him quite haunting.
In the middle chapter Nick uses his leave to visit friends in London. His wife Isobel and young child get a passing reference. If I was Isobel I’d be mightily annoyed that my husband spent his army leave in Blitz-torn London rather than in the country with his newly-expanded family, but maybe she’s more tolerant than I am.
This middle section was hugely moving. Powell conveys the tragedy of war, of lives cut short without warning. Of the senseless waste and cruel arbitrariness of it all. He does it all with understatement which perfectly drives home the horror, and how this became a regular occurrence for so many. It was an astonishing chapter.
It is in army life that Powell finds his comedy and satire. This was probably the most sad, most moving, and most silly and funny of all the volumes I’ve read so far.
I particularly enjoyed a completely daft dinner scene between two Colonels, one called Eric, one called Derrick. Powell uses the rhyming names to full effect, having both of them end their sentences with the other’s name, as they engage in a furious, but politely mannered argument.
“Both habitually showed anxiety to avoid a junior officer’s eye at meals in case speech might seem required. To make sure nothing so inadvertent should happen, each would uninterruptedly gaze into the other’s face across the table, with all the fixedness of a newly engaged couple, eternally enchanted by the charming in appearance of the other.”
There’s also Nick’s experience of inciting the wrath of a General, when he admits he doesn’t like Trollope and prefers another author:
“‘There’s always Balzac, sir.’
‘Balzac!’
General Liddament roared the name. It was impossible to know if Balzac had been a very good answer or a very bad one.”
The more I read of this sequence the more impressive I find it. Powell’s wit, humanity, clear-sightedness, and ability to balance the various aspects of life are really extraordinary. And he does it all with such a light touch.
“All the same, although the soldier might abnegate thought and action, it has never been suggested that he should abnegate grumbling.”
To end, I’m feeling quite smug for working out that I can shoehorn in an 80s pop video by choosing one by some of the Blitz Kids (and fair to say 80s pop videos did not generally follow an Anthony Powell-esque light touch 😀 ):

That first quote almost makes me want to try reading Powell again.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I will do my best to wear away at the ‘almost’ before the end of the year Susan 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very much admire your Spandau Ballet work (one of my faves).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Kate 😀
LikeLike
Nick’s marriage is barely mentioned throughout the sequence of novels. He concentrates on the other people around him, and as you say does seem to ignore his wife and growing family. It’s not that kind of narrative stance, I suppose: it’s not really about his own love life – the dance is the thing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, he seems least interested in portraying himself or his family. As you say, it’s not his focus.
LikeLike
Wonderful post Madame B – I do remember this being one of the stand out books of the sequence. As others have said he doesn’t feature his family much, and I wonder if that was Powell’s choice, not wanting to build those really close to him into the narrative. Nevertheless, he does tell such a wonderful story and is brilliant at capturing character. As you say, the picture of blitzed London is memorable. As for Widmerpool – what a character!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks so much Kaggsy! I thought the same – maybe it was respect for his family that meant he kept them out, or maybe a narrative choice or a bit of both.
It is an incredible story and such a vivid evocation of Blitzed London.
Widmerpool is becoming steadily more terrifying!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Once again, a brilliant review Madame B. I defy anyone who hasn’t already read this series to resist for long after reading your summaries. I am feeling the tension between tha call of my teetering tbr piles and my slightly dog-eared copies of Powell on the bookshelves!
I remember this being a particularly poignant and sharply observed book in the sequence. I think Nick deliberately stands at a distance from his personal domestic circumstances in order to be a more objective commentator.
Your assessment of the portrait of Stringer does resonate with my feelings about him as a deeply troubled, intriguing, melancholic character. Ghostly does encapsulate it exactly.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks so much! I’m really pleased to be tempting you to a re-read. It’s always a tension isn’t it, between old favourites and the call of the new…
It’s really interesting to hear how this stood out for you. I did find it so striking, and that middle chapter really moving.
It’s reassuring to hear you had a similar experience with Stringer. He’s quietly devastating, it’s so sad.
LikeLike
As ever, it’s lovely to read your thoughts on these books, Madame Bibi, partly because your posts remind me of various aspects of the series. I remember enjoying the war volumes more than I expected, possibly because I wasn’t expecting the humour, which acts as a sort of counterweight to the poignancy arising from the conflict.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Jacqui! Yes, I’m enjoying the war sections more than I expected too. I think its because he keeps such a human focus through it all. And as you say, the humour is very finely judged.
LikeLike
This seems once again to have successfully balanced the pathos and distress of the war sections with the humour. I enjoyed that quote about books and readers and the fun scene between the generals. I must sound like a broken record but will say again that each of your reviews makes me want to start this series soon.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, he balances it so well, it’s so carefully done. The scene between the generals is so completely silly, it’s really entertaining! I’m really pleased to be encouraging you towards the series Mallika, I hope you enjoy it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good to hear that the project continues to reward you, book after book.
Have you watched “The Greatest Night of Pop”? I think you’d really love it. (It’s on Netflix in Canada, not sure what other streaming services might offer it.)
LikeLiked by 1 person
No I haven’t, thank you for the tip! I don’t have Netflix but I’ll have a hunt around and see if I can watch it.
LikeLike
I think the war volumes are the best in the sequence.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m just about to start the third war volume so this is very encouraging to hear!
LikeLike
Pingback: “One often felt ungrateful in literary matters, as in so many others.” (Anthony Powell) | madame bibi lophile recommends