I really enjoyed my first experience of Irmgard Keun when I read Child of All Nations last year, and so I was looking forward to picking her up again. Women in Translation Month provided the perfect opportunity. Ferdinand, The Man With the Kind Heart (1950, transl. Michael Hoffman 2020) was her final novel, written not long after the end of World War Two, and just a year after the division of Germany. (There is some dated language in the novel).

The story is told from the point of view of titular Ferdinand as he somewhat listlessly makes his way around war-torn Köln (Cologne). The privations continue and the illicit economy thrives. Keun is so witty and gives her narrator an inventive turn of phrase:

“The Moselle tastes as flaccid and murky as the decayed philanthropy of an unhappily married vintner. The Belgian cigarettes taste of rancid hay.”

His landlady Frau Stabhorn is thriving in her own way, renting her hallway to him as a room, making jam to sell and caring for her grandchildren.  Ferdinand’s experience of this brood is expressed with a degree of tolerant irony:

“Children are the bonny little blossoms in the mouldering garden of life. As I write, a couple of the bonny little blossoms are trying to spread a mixture of jam and plaster of paris all over my arms and legs.”

The book is really a series of portraits, with the plot mainly existing as the passage of time. We meet fellow lodgers:

“Lily is the victim of her beautiful feet. She studies chemistry and earns money on the side from knitting sweaters and writing.”

And poverty-stricken Ferdinand is later employed by a snake-oil salesman:

“Liebezhl draws horoscopes, reads palms, swings crystals, lays cards, sells amulets, and does a little podiatry.”  

Who offers him work as a sort of agony uncle:

“Waiting for me outside my office I had, among others, a man with broken fingernails, a wine grower who wanted to get married for the fourth time, a girl who had been beaten by her mother with a curtain rod, five deserted wives, and a sixth who wished to be deserted because her husband snored. I had my work cut out for me.”

Meanwhile, Ferdinand is trying to work out how to get out of his engagement, again observed with a certain ironic detachment:

“There are three items that Luise managed to hang onto throughout the war: a stove, an electric iron, and me. All three of us are a little impaired, and not quite good as new. But Luise is hanging tenaciously, not to say grimly, on to all of us. Her favourite is the stove, and next, even ahead of the iron, is me.”

So, there is a lot of humour in Ferdinand, but there are some very serious points that Keun makes too. And in fact I found the listless, plotless, artless quality to the character and the story to be a serious point too. Ferdinand was a solder and a prisoner of war. To me, his narrative style, his detachment, numbness, ironical distancing, lack of real interest in anything, was a portrait of trauma.

He doesn’t dwell on his past, but when mentioned it is striking:

“My only feeling was fear. I was swimming in an ocean of fear… I was afraid of the NCOs, headquarters, uniforms, barracks, corporals, the officers’ voices—the whole massive machinery of it.

I no longer saw human beings, all I saw were the mechanical manifestations of a force that hypnotised me to the point of crippling despair.”

There is also disgust and cynicism regarding former Nazis living their daily lives, such as Luise’s father:

“He settled down among the spoils of his wife and pouted. His wife and daughter waited on him, the household was his to command, and gradually he clambered back up to the temporarily vacant throne of the family dictator, and everyone tried to be as satisfied and dissatisfied as they’d been previously, in the good old days.”

And sadly of course, his observations have not dated, although specifics change:

“Dictatorships are always very strict about what they understand as morals and public ethics. Our former unlimited German dictatorship has, in the way of lower life forms, procreated by simple fission, and is now called democracy.”

All in all, I found Ferdinand an intriguing read. There was a sense at the end that despite being the titular character and first-person narrator, he had slipped through my fingers. But as I thought about how this was the point, I found this very affecting. Cologne and its citizens were in a process of recovery, trying to understand what remained and how to live after devastation (60% of the city was bombed). As an exploration of the aftermath of war on individuals and on society, it was skilled, subtle and truly moving.

“There are people to whom the whole world is a toy, and who love it and take it as seriously and carefully as they take their toys.”