“On the whole it seems to be English women who don’t marry.” (Barbara Pym, Less Than Angels)

Earlier in this month of #SpinsterSeptember hosted by @pear-jelly, I read The Sweet Dove Died by Barbara Pym. I wanted to try and squeeze in another Pym before the end, and I really enjoyed reading Less Than Angels (1955), an earlier novel and more typical in tone, with its comic portraits of a group of anthropologists and their small dramas of daily life.

The novel opens with one spinster, Catherine Oliphant:

“she earned her living writing stories and articles for women’s magazines and had to draw her inspiration from everyday life, though life itself was sometimes too strong and raw and must be made palatable by fancy, as tough meat may be made tender by mincing.”

I wondered if that was a commentary by Pym on her own art? Who knows, but it was striking for its visceral imagery which felt untypical to me.

Meanwhile, Deirdre Swan is nineteen years old and living with her spinster aunt Rhoda and widowed mother Mabel.

“Deirdre was different, clever and moody, rather like she herself had been at the same age, before marriage to a good dull man and life in a suburb had steadied her.”

Deirdre is desperate for life to begin: to get away from the London suburb, to fall passionately in love rather than go on boring dates with suitably staid suitors. When she sees handsome young anthropologist Tom Mallow, she hopes there is opportunity for dramatic change. But Tom lives with Catherine…

“On the bus she wondered whether Tom had high principles, like Bernard. She was sure, somehow, that he had a delightful lack of them.”

In fairness to Deirdre’s suburb, it’s not entirely dull. Her neighbour is Alaric Lydgate, an anthropologist refusing to share his (likely useless) notes with Tom, closely observed by Mabel and Rhoda, confounding them by undertaking eccentric behaviour such as leaving rugs out on his lawn overnight.

Pym has a lot of fun exploring the department where Tom has returned after time overseas, where academics jostle for grants and wonder if they are spending time writing up interminable theses which will be forever unread.

She also draws parallels between daily life of women in post-war Britain and the more lauded anthropologists. Rhoda and Mabel are close observers of societal structure and ritual, and of a way of life that is disappearing rapidly. They just aren’t making a career from it. In fact, they feel guilty for not being serious-minded and instead borrowing novels from the library:

“And so it came about that, like many other well-meaning people, they worried not so much about the dreadful things themselves as about their own inability to worry about them.”

Tom, part of landed gentry, later wonders:

“When really, when one came to consider it, what could be more primitive than the rigid ceremonial of launching a debutante on the marriage market?”

We follow the department’s inhabitants for a time, their gentle professional and personal frustrations and triumphs. Less Than Angels is a quick read, expertly drawing the reader in to this small circle.

For Pym fans, there are references to other works here. Everard Bone and Mildred from Excellent Women are mentioned, and Catherine reflects:

“I’m not one of those excellent women, who can just go home and eat a boiled egg and make a cup of tea and be very splendid, she thought, but how useful it would be if I were! She thought wistfully of herself like this.”

To me this didn’t quite have the sparkle of that novel, or my favourite Pym so far, Quartet in Autumn. But there was still so much to enjoy here: the astute but compassionate characterisation, the close observation, the gentle humour. I’m so pleased to have got back to Pym throughout #SpinsterSeptember and it’s encouraged me not to leave it so long in future.

“What odd turns life does take! And how much more comfortable it sometimes was to observe it from a distance, to look down from an upper window, as it were, as the anthropologists did.”

“Being unmarried has its own status.” (Barbara Pym, The Sweet Dove Died)

I’ve been meaning to get back to reading Barbara Pym, and what better time than #SpinsterSeptember, hosted by @pear-jelly. Pym fills her novels with ‘excellent women’ spinsters, although the character of Leonora Eyre in The Sweet Dove Died (1978) is a bit of a departure. Pym observed in a letter to Phillip Larkin “I didn’t try to make it so, but tended to leave out boring cosiness and concentrate on the darker side.”

The novel opens with Humphrey Boyce, a middle-aged antique dealer and his young nephew James, helping Leonora Eyre from a Bond Street salesroom and taking her to lunch. Leonora has been overcome placing the winning bid for a Victorian flower book (!)

Everything about Leonora is performatively Victorian, summed up brilliantly in this description of her bedside table:

“Browning and Matthew Arnold—her favourite poets—took their place with her Guerlain cologne, a bottle of smelling salts, soft aquamarine paper tissues, a phial of brightly coloured pills to relieve stress and strain, and presiding over all these the faded photographs of a handsome man and a sweet faced woman in late-Victorian dress. Leonora had long ago decided that her grandparents were much more distinguished looking than her father and mother whose photographs had been hidden away in a drawer.”

Her romanticising of the bygone era doesn’t ever acknowledge that during that time, she would not have been allowed to inherit her parents estate or own property, two things which allow her to live out her entirely self-focussed twentieth-century life.

There is absolutely no generosity to Leonora, everything and everyone is about meeting her own needs. Thus as a love triangle of sorts emerges between the three, her motives are not inspired by who Humphrey or James are, but what they can do for her.

In fairness, James has no idea who he is either. He is in his twenties but remains curiously unformed, even allowing for his young age.

“James was not yet sure what he wanted from life, and had so far tended to avoid violent extremes of any kind.”

He has sexual dalliances with Phoebe, a young woman who he cares for very little, and Ned, a visiting American academic who is entirely uncommitted to him despite James wanting more. There is a lack of intimacy in James’ closest relationships, which is perhaps why he and Leonora are well-suited. She likes the flattery of an attentive younger man, but really wants very little else. Proud of her history of male suitors, none of them seem to actually have amounted to a relationship.

Aware she is losing her looks, Leonora still has admirers:

“One day, Humphrey flattered himself, she would become bored with the novelty of James’s youth and realise the more lasting qualities—virtues, almost—of a man nearer her own age who was tall and kept his figure and was bald only in the most distinguished kind of way.”

But even Humphrey is beginning to lose interest towards the end of the novel.

As we follow these curious three for a while, there is all of Pym’s brilliant social observation around English niceties and the exposure of character in the smallest of details. Yet there is more cruelty portrayed in this novel than I expect with Pym. Leonora behaves appallingly at times, and is truly unpleasant. Ned is in many ways her match, a young man at ease with hurting others to get what he wants. However, the author’s eye remains compassionate to them all, and so there is never a bitter taste left by what the reader witnesses. Rather it is all the foibles and follies Pym usually turns her attention to, but with a darker edge.

Although less humorous than some of her earlier novels, there is still humour to enjoy here, such as Humphrey’s vanity over his baldness, or the check he places on one flight of fancy:

“But he soon dismissed the picture from his mind as impossible and ludicrous. A woodland seduction scene between two middle-aged protagonists could only end in disaster.”

Towards the end, there is a real sense of impending, true sadness for Leonora, unless she mends her ways:

“She had always cared as much for inanimate objects as for people and now spent hours looking after her possessions, washing the china and cleaning the silver obsessively and rearranging them in her rooms.”

But Pym’s light touch remains, and so situations and people remain unresolved but not without hope.

This would be a great choice for a book group, as the characters remain somewhat enigmatic. No great insights or changes occur, their motivations and feelings oblique and unknown even to themselves. It would be interesting to hear a group discussion of how they each interpreted them…

I really enjoyed returning to Pym’s world, masterfully drawn, sharply observed, sympathetically portrayed without sentimentality. I’m hoping to get to Less Than Angels before the month is out!